Re: net/dccp: warning in dccp_feat_clone_sp_val/__might_sleep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry, the warning is still there.

I'm not sure adding sched_annotate_sleep() does anything, since it's
defined as (in case CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is not set):
# define sched_annotate_sleep() do { } while (0)

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 19:59 +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> Tested with both patches applied, still seeing the warning.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Arg, sorry, this was at the wrong place.
>
> Thanks for testing !
>
> diff --git a/net/dccp/output.c b/net/dccp/output.c
> index b66c84db0766..2548edff86ff 100644
> --- a/net/dccp/output.c
> +++ b/net/dccp/output.c
> @@ -224,6 +224,11 @@ static int dccp_wait_for_ccid(struct sock *sk, unsigned long delay)
>
>         prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>         sk->sk_write_pending++;
> +
> +       /* release_sock()/lock_sock() will process socket backlog
> +        * from process context. Be prepared to sleep !
> +        */
> +       sched_annotate_sleep();
>         release_sock(sk);
>
>         remaining = schedule_timeout(delay);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux