Re: [PATCH 0/4] dccp: Congestion Window > Sequence Window

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>The only patch that has an issue is #2: this reintroduces a problem which
> occurred earlier when performing feature negotiation during the initial
> handshake. Since your patch set targets feature negotiation in established
> state, there should be a way to enable both - i.e. keep the old behaviour
> for the initial, and use the new one for the established state.

I'm working on slightly modifying the patch to fix this issue. Will
repost shortly.

> Other issues that would be good to resolve before uploading the patches:
>  * some have minor codingstyle issues, I am ok to fix stuff up to some
>    degree; but please consider scripts/checkpatch.pl

I actually did run that script over these patches, and the script
reported no problems. I've re-read the codingstyle document and don't
see anything clearly wrong. What am I doing that's not standard coding
style?

>  * could you add comments (short descriptions) about conditions you observed,
>    or add pointers to documentation webpages in the commit message? It helps
>    in future discussions to come back on track faster.

I'll do that. Right now, I'm making the changes you suggested to the
patches. I hope to repost them shortly.

Samuel Jero
Internetworking Research Group
Ohio University

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux