[RFD] dccp: Rate Mismatch Controller -- still requires high-res timers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have finished a simple proof-of-concept implementation of the Rate Mismatch Controller for TFRC and put the patches/results on
  
  http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/notes/ccid3/sender_notes/rate_mismatch_controller/

The results are not as good as had been hoped - in particular, it still seems
necessary to use high-res timers in order to achieve reasonable stability and
accuracy.

Perhaps I have missed something, but as it stands, I can not see an advantage
in using this for TFRC - comments welcome.

Gerrit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux