On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 03:25:48PM -0300, Ivo Calado wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 15:21, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 03:12:14PM -0300, Ivo Calado wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 15:06, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Ivo Calado wrote, On 10/13/2009 07:18 PM: > >> > > >> > ... > >> >> Following the rule #8 in Documentation/SubmittingPatches the patch is ... > >> 8) E-mail size. > >> > >> ... > >> Large changes are not appropriate for mailing lists, and some > >> maintainers. If your patch, uncompressed, exceeds 40 kB in size, ... > > Large changes are not appropriate for mailing lists, and some > > maintainers. If your patch, uncompressed, exceeds 300 kB in size, ... > Hi Jarek, > strange! I'm using the current DCCP test tree, branch dccp. > Am I correct in use these rules? Hmm... Looks like a fresh change in Linus' (and net-next) tree. So, there is a hard legal question: which tree rules should be respected here? I guess you're one of a few respecting these rules ;-) Well done! Best regards, Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
