On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Em Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:20:48PM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu: >> | > is there any news regarding the CCID/module loading problem on the 64 >> | > bit computer with 32 bit kernel? >> | > >> <snip> >> | Hello Gerrit, >> | yes! I think that we found the commit that inserted the problem (probably). >> | >> | This is the list of commits, the first time that the problem >> | occurs is in "f76fd327a8b32d3ad5b51639faf6f54d18be0981". I'm sending >> | to you the tree commits before the BAD that it is working properly. >> | >> | - BAD - Gerrit Renker f76fd327a8b32d3ad5b51639faf6f54d18be0981 dccp >> Ah that would explain it. Did you check the logs - if the not-loading >> was due to low timer resolution, then there should be a message like >> "Timer to coarse (xxx usec), need 10usec". >> >> If that is the case, >> 1. does the problem disappear when commenting out >> 'return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT' in ccid3_module_init() below or if >> 2. the kernel is compiled with support for high-resolution timers? >> >> >> + if (tp.tv_sec || tp.tv_nsec > DCCP_TIME_RESOLUTION * NSEC_PER_USEC) { >> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Timer too coarse (%ld usec), need %u-usec" >> + " resolution - check your clocksource.\n", __func__, >> + tp.tv_nsec/NSEC_PER_USEC, DCCP_TIME_RESOLUTION); >> + return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT; >> + } >> >> Thanks a lot for following this up, this now looks a much more likely cause. > > Makes complete sense, to finish this, Leandro, can you please tell us > what is the value of CONFIG_HZ in your config? > > - Arnaldo > CONFIG_HZ_250=y CONFIG_HZ=250 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html