Re: net-next-2.6 [pull-request] [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Revised set of feature-negotiation patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:28:07 +0200

> | There are two paths forward at the current point in time.
> | 
> | 1) You submit a very small group of patches at a time to me.
> |    I'm talking like 5 or 6 patches at a time, maximum.
> | 
> |    And I'm going to give extra amounts of personal review to
> |    these, so it will take even more time than usual.
> | 
> Further review can never harm, so I am sure this will be good.
> 
> I have a question regarding granularity - the current granularity is
> meant to be logical, but is low.
> It is easy to get distracted by the details since at the end of
> the day the 37 patches achieve a rewriting of feat.c in small steps.
> 
> Would you therefore be ok with me combining some of the patches or would
> you prefer to review the set at its current granularity?

Current granularity.

So, submit about 5 pieces at a time, you can say at the beginning of
the series (in the [PATCH 0/X]: email) something like "this is phase N
in the rewriting of feat.c which will achieve X Y and Z"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux