-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit Renker wrote: > RFC 3493 says that 0 for socktype/protocol means that caller will accept > any socket type / protocol, so presumably this does include DCCP and UDP-Lite. I know what the RFC says. But there are a gazillion of protocols out there and I won't create a record for all of them in case socktype and protocol are zero. That's just overkill in 99.9% of all cases. I assumption is that UDPlite is just too specialized to be useful to a wide array of people. Yes, it case be supported if explicitly requested but should be returned if 0/0 is passed in. What I'm asking is whether this is a fair assumption and what the story of DCCP is. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIKvHb2ijCOnn/RHQRAlz5AKCvOSOm7PR7ljfyZ9krq0TtzZUTbgCdFLLj F1fvWvR+VvXUSE5x+VtgsqQ= =3Lft -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
