From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:21:28 +0100 > Since I can currently not see the last point happen within DCCP, I think > that the use of skb->priority for layer 4 (DCCP) is safe. Ok. > So the remaining question was whether maintainers would be okay with > this "overloading" of the field (Arnaldo seems ok with it). I'm okay with it, thanks for the explanation and analysis. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
