On Jan 5, 2008 5:28 AM, Tomasz Grobelny <tomasz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks. But while we are at your patch I have one more question: why > did you choose to implement the algorithm it in ccid3? Shouldn't > packet priorities and expiration times be processed indepentent of > ccids? Until now it seemed for me that ccids only control _when_ you > send data, _what_ you send should be determined by other means. Am I > missing something here? This is just for my own private research. If I was proposing this to be included with the kernel I would agree with you totally. Ian -- Web1: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/ Web2: http://www.jandi.co.nz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
