Re: [PATCH 4/6]: Don't assign negative values to Ack Ratio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/28/07, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [DCCP]: Don't process Ack twice in Respond state
>
Is this patch been posted twice. There are two patches in this email...

> [CCID2]: Don't assign negative values to Ack Ratio
>
> Since it makes not sense to assign negative values to Ack Ratio, this
> patch disallows this possibility.
>
> As a consequence, a Bug test for negative Ack Ratio values becomes obsolete.
>
> Furthermore, a check against overflow (as Ack Ratio may not exceed 2 bytes,
> due to RFC 4340, 11.3) has been added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux