On 10/10/07, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [DCCP]: More informative state names > > This realises a naming scheme due to Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (many thanks), which > assigns more informative/declarative names to the auxiliary and intermediate states > PASSIVE_1/2i - which exist to facilitate passive-Close: > > s/PASSIVE_1/DCCP_PASSIVE_CLOSE/g; /* any node receiving a Close */ > s/PASSIVE_2/DCCP_PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ/g; /* when client receives CloseReq */ > > In addition, to better separate between sending and receiving a CloseReq, > > s/CLOSEREQ/DCCP_ACTIVE_CLOSEREQ/g; /* server sending a CloseReq */ > > However, for pretty-printing and system logs, the name of the last state remains > at `CLOSEREQ', for consistency. > > Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
