2007/9/21, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Em Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 05:02:40PM +0300, Tommi Saviranta escreveu:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 14:54:32 -0300, ツ Leandro Sales wrote:
> > > diff -uprN dccp-ccid4.base/net/dccp/ccids/Makefile
> > > dccp-ccid4/net/dccp/ccids/Makefile
> > > --- dccp-ccid4.base/net/dccp/ccids/Makefile 2007-09-20 11:45:30.000000000 -0300
> > > +++ dccp-ccid4/net/dccp/ccids/Makefile 2007-09-20 11:55:23.000000000 -0300
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tommi Saviranta <wnd@xxxxxx>
> >
> > By the way one more question about acking/signing patches. When talking
> > about trivial patches such as this, is there a consensus on if simple
> > patches need to be (or should be) acked or signed in the first place?
> >
> > Personally I was a little reluctant to sign this one, but signed it
> > anyway as requested.
>
> It is always good to show that you agree with the change, read
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches to get more food for thought.
>
> I'll try to harvest the signatures when I get to review/merge the
> patches.
>
> And keep up the good work, I'm really happy with how healthy the DCCP on
> Linux developer community is getting, thank you all!
>
> - Arnaldo
>
I just update the file thinking about the future changes to the DCCP
implementation, for instance, adding new CCIDs. Since I have other
patches to apply, I decided to submit this one too. Since we were
submit initial patches for CCID-4, I considerer that this initial
process will require some adjusts like that. Besides, our patches (the
mine and Tommi's ones) was very similar, and them I just sent the
remains patches.
Tommi, when you agree with some patch, you can send a NAK ("no ack"),
as Gerrit said.
Arnaldo, it is good to know from you that our works are welcomed.
Leandro.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
