Re: [PATCH 1/6]: Avoid accumulation of large send credit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



|  Agree with Gerrit's comments in patchset description that there is
|  still discussion around this. Still doing something is better than
|  doing nothing.
Also agree with what you are saying. This is really why I would like
to get the experimental test tree for DCCP/CCID3 started soon.

With the mechanism already in place, it is a trivial change to use
a different value. 

Kohler/Floyd currently suggest to use 1 RTT, which derives from the theory of TFRC. 

The value t_ipi derives from the way the packets are currently scheduled.

Neither value may be the last piece of wisdom - we need people testing
this and report their experience + suggestions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux