[PATCH 03/10] loss_interval: Fix timeval initialisation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When compiling with EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W noticed that tstamp is not initialised
correctly in dccp_li_calc_first_li.

Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c
index 2d203ae..9686a8d 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c
@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static u32 ccid3_hc_rx_calc_first_li(struct sock *sk)
 	struct dccp_rx_hist_entry *entry, *next, *tail = NULL;
 	u32 x_recv, p;
 	suseconds_t rtt, delta;
-	struct timeval tstamp = { 0, };
+	struct timeval tstamp = { 0, 0 };
 	int interval = 0;
 	int win_count = 0;
 	int step = 0;
-- 
1.5.0.6

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux