On 3/12/07, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have put quite a lot of work into
* bringing CCID 3 up to spec
* implement loss detection according to RFC 3448/4342
* add loss intervals handling according to rfc3448bis
* many cool new features
* ample documentation, applications, and test modules for most features
However, since patches are small for review-ability, this amounts to a total of 75 patches,
including the patch backlog; please see suggestion (2).
1. PREVIEW: Since mostly the following files are modified:
net/dccp/ccids/lib/ccid3.*
net/dccp/ccids/lib/loss_interval.*
net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.*
I have posted combined patches onto
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/patches_working-set/
These apply in-order (see series file) onto today's tree. They have been extensively tested,
can offer a test module for most essential features.
2. SUGGESTION: Since the patch backlog is really quite old now (over 2 months), I would like
to suggest to re-submit it as one, combined patch, in the format of
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/patches_working-set/01_The_Patch_Backlog.diff
(maybe a bit more verbose)
==> But this depends on whether people are ok with this (see (3))
No, what I think is the best to do is to consider your patch backlog
as a separate git tree that now will be pulled, preserving the
changesets history.
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
