| > I have a snapshot which illustrates this state: | > | > http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/dccp_probe/examples/no_tx_locking/transmit_rate.png | > | > The oscillating behaviour is well visible. In contrast, I am sure that you would agree that the | > desirable state is the following: | > | > http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/dccp_probe/examples/with_tx_locking/transmit_rate.png | > | | Questions on the graphs: | - are these direct connect nodes? The nodes are on the same Ethernet LAN, connected via 100Mbps / 1GBps interfaces. There is no other traffic on that LAN. | - why is Xcalc 0? Since no losses occurred (p is always 0 on these tests). | - why on the stable one is Xrecv different from X. Is X the rate that | it is allowed to send at but doesn't so only achieves Xrecv? When there is no loss, X = max(min(2*X, 2*X_recv), s/R) - the graph agrees with this, since X is about 2*X_recv. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
