Re: [dccp] Re: [PATCH 2/5]: DCCP Recalc on non-loss intervals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Also, the weights in dccp_li_hist_w appear to be wrong. They should be 5, 5,
5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, not 4,4,4,4,3,2,1,1, according to rfc3448.

I don't believe so. We've done this as per section 8 of RFC3448 and
divide by 4 rather than 5.


Ah yes, never mind.
Eddie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux