Re: [PATCH 1/5]: DCCP Fix use of invalid loss intervals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/5/07, Eddie Kohler <kohler@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But the two bit patterns are the same, and the comparison will promote
them both to unsigned.

When I test from userspace I reach the same conclusion.

However without that patch in the kernel I get problems.

We have been having some weird signed/unsigned stuff going on - I'm
wondering if its something in the kernel build environment as it is
quite bizarre at times....

Ian
--
Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4
Blog: http://imcdnzl.blogspot.com
WAND Network Research Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux