Quoting Ian McDonald:
| On 1/4/07, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > This is a revision of the earliest patches in the backlog,the
| > more recent ones will be sent separately.
| >
| Can you tell us what was revised?
The breakdown of individual changes is as follows: (you can also use interdiff against the
previously submitted patches, I state the links below):
Patch 1: "Macros for 48-bit sequence number arithmetic"
Previous: http://www.mail-archive.com/dccp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg01158.html
CHANGE: use the convention that macros are upper-case (was not previously)
Patch 2: "Signed variant of dccp_delta_seqno"
Previous: http://www.mail-archive.com/dccp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg01159.html
CHANGE: 1) Tossed out the unnecessary _add48/_sub48 macros (covered already)
2) Clarified the commit message (was not very clear before)
Patch 3: "Make `before' relation unambiguous"
Previous: http://www.mail-archive.com/dccp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg01161.html
CHANGE: Removed the hunk which affected `max48' (since not really necessary)
==> Please note: The TCP variant of this new definition has been withdrawn,
on the grounds that old code depends on it. I still maintain
that the new definition is useful and a better choice for DCCP.
Patch 4: "Fix for follows48"
Previous: http://www.mail-archive.com/dccp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg01160.html
CHANGE: No code change, merely the commit message has been reformatted.
Patch 5: "Introduce macro for incrementing modulo-48"
==> This is a brand-new patch :), it has not been posted before.
I decided to lump it in with the others since it belongs to the sequence
number arithmetic (and relates to some email questions I sent).
Gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
