I've been trying to fix up performance for CCID3 and found this little
bug that means the comparison was invalid and we were using invalid loss
intervals when we shouldn't of.
Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/lib/loss_interval.c b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/loss_interval.c
index 0a0baef..372d7e7 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ccids/lib/loss_interval.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/loss_interval.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ u32 dccp_li_hist_calc_i_mean(struct list_head *list)
u32 w_tot = 0;
list_for_each_entry_safe(li_entry, li_next, list, dccplih_node) {
- if (li_entry->dccplih_interval != ~0) {
+ if (li_entry->dccplih_interval != ~0U) {
i_tot0 += li_entry->dccplih_interval * dccp_li_hist_w[i];
w_tot += dccp_li_hist_w[i];
if (i != 0)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
