Re: [PATCH 5/8]: Add protection against invalid parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Ian McDonald:
|  On 12/2/06, Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|  
|  > [DCCP]: Add protection against invalid parameters to TFRC routines
|  >
|  > +       BUG_ON(p >  1000000);           /* p must not exceed 100%   */
|  > +       BUG_ON(p == 0);                 /* f(0) = 0, divide by zero */
|  
|  I know I put the original BUG_ONs in but can we change this to a
|  DCCP_BUG or a WARN - just to prevent the possible issues depending on
|  bottom half context...
I thought about this too and initially both were DCCP_BUG_ON(). However,
this just delays the Kerboom! -- as I have had to learn painfully:
	* case `p > 1000000' leads to accessing illegal memory - kernel panics
	* case `p == 0' leads to division by zero

I have had one kernel Oops because of not making them DCCP_BUG_ON. The good
side of using this is safety: if this condition is met, we will know from console
output, and we will also know that there is serious trouble somewhere else.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux