| > | I violently agree with Gerrit on this one, no one is preventing anyone
| ^^^^^^^^^^
| ^^^^^^^^^^
Ouch - I was sure I had read `violently disagree'. Weierha ...
| > | from doing experimental work, the infrastructure is there and if
| > | changes are required for supporting different ways of the DCCP core
| > | interacting with any new CCID (experimental or a standard) we'd love
| > | to hear so as to work on making the Linux DCCP infrastructure as
| > | useful as possible for the community at large.
| > |
| > I can not see your disagreement in this. The fact is that the Linux DCCP implementation currently is
| > not compliant with the RFCs and an implementation which only partially implements a standard is of
| > not much service to the community. Features which have not met the approval of public bodies such as
| > the IETF, on the other hand, serve the interest of only a few and not that of a larger community.
|
| Lemme reread what I've wrote... English is not my first language so I
.... and it is not my first language either. I misread your email.
I had read it as `violently disagree'. Sorry for the mistake.
While at it, I think that the thanks and a big lot of kudos clearly goes to you - having provided basically
the entire infrastructure on which DCCP currently rests.
Gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
