[PATCH 6/7]: Remove redundant statements in init_sequence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[DCCP]: Remove redundant statements in init_sequence (ISS)

This patch removes the following redundancies:

 1) The test skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) in dccp_v6_init_sequence
    is always true since 
     * dccp_v6_conn_request() is the only calling function
     * dccp_v6_conn_request() redirects all skb's with ETH_P_IP to
       dccp_v4_conn_request()

 2) The first argument, `struct sock *sk', of dccp_v{4,6}_init_sequence()
    is never used.

(This is similar for tcp_v{4,6}_init_sequence, an analogous patch has been
 submitted to netdev and merged.)

By the way - are the `sport' / `dport' arguments in the right order?
I have made them consistent among calls but they seem to be in the
reverse order.

Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>    
---
 net/dccp/ipv4.c |    5 ++---
 net/dccp/ipv6.c |   20 ++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
@@ -366,8 +366,7 @@ void dccp_v4_send_check(struct sock *sk,
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_v4_send_check);
 
-static inline u64 dccp_v4_init_sequence(const struct sock *sk,
-					const struct sk_buff *skb)
+static inline u64 dccp_v4_init_sequence(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	return secure_dccp_sequence_number(skb->nh.iph->daddr,
 					   skb->nh.iph->saddr,
@@ -660,7 +659,7 @@ int dccp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk
 	 */
 	dreq = dccp_rsk(req);
 	dreq->dreq_isr	   = dcb->dccpd_seq;
-	dreq->dreq_iss	   = dccp_v4_init_sequence(sk, skb);
+	dreq->dreq_iss	   = dccp_v4_init_sequence(skb);
 	dreq->dreq_service = service;
 
 	if (dccp_v4_send_response(sk, req, NULL))
--- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
@@ -76,20 +76,12 @@ static inline void dccp_v6_send_check(st
 	dh->dccph_checksum = dccp_v6_csum_finish(skb, &np->saddr, &np->daddr);
 }
 
-static __u32 dccp_v6_init_sequence(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+static inline __u32 dccp_v6_init_sequence(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	const struct dccp_hdr *dh = dccp_hdr(skb);
-
-	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
-		return secure_tcpv6_sequence_number(skb->nh.ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32,
-						    skb->nh.ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32,
-						    dh->dccph_dport,
-						    dh->dccph_sport);
-
-	return secure_dccp_sequence_number(skb->nh.iph->daddr,
-					   skb->nh.iph->saddr,
-					   dh->dccph_dport,
-					   dh->dccph_sport);
+	return secure_tcpv6_sequence_number(skb->nh.ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32,
+					    skb->nh.ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32,
+					    dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_dport,
+					    dccp_hdr(skb)->dccph_sport     );
 }
 
 static void dccp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
@@ -488,7 +480,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_conn_request(struct s
 	 */
 	dreq = dccp_rsk(req);
 	dreq->dreq_isr	   = dcb->dccpd_seq;
-	dreq->dreq_iss	   = dccp_v6_init_sequence(sk, skb);
+	dreq->dreq_iss	   = dccp_v6_init_sequence(skb);
 	dreq->dreq_service = service;
 
 	if (dccp_v6_send_response(sk, req, NULL))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [IETF DCCP]     [Linux Networking]     [Git]     [Security]     [Linux Assembly]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux