| > In a forthcoming communication to SIGCOMM-06, the inventors of DCCP say that | > they were "motivated by keeping the basic API as simple as UDP's" and that | > "DCCP should provide applications with an API as simple as that of UDP". | | I think the same authors killed me on this point. I believe their motivation is | "we want service codes to be used" and that they are a useful thing. I agree | with them, but I don't agree on "forcing the users to use service codes". I have the same idea; the proposal is an attempt to make the API simple without contradicting the spec. UDP also does not contradict its spec and yet is simple to program; if the same can be done with DCCP, that would be great. Thanks for mentioning dccp@xxxxxxxx, have copied message there. If there are no strong objections, will send patch on Monday. - Gerrit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
