On 3/7/06, John S. Estabrook <jestabro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Connie, 2.0.2 is the recommended version, which addresses several bugs in > 2.0.1; the patch for 2.0.2, if you're refering to the one mentionied at > the bottom of the iperf page, was submitted but is not necessary---it's a > feature addition (re DCCP), not a bug fix. > I wondered who had also written an iperf patch for DCCP besides me and I see that my code has been posted up there :-) Just a note for those looking in future - the iperf works for Linux 2.6.14 but not on the latest development kernels. I will work on fixing this at some point but if anybody feels brave I think it is because of the introduction of service codes. It is also worth adding multiple CCID support as well I believe... I also intend to start merging some of the changes into the iperf codebase over time (probably a long time with my current workload!). Also this code was originally written by others and I've just tidied it up a little bit. Ian -- Ian McDonald Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4 Blog: http://imcdnzl.blogspot.com WAND Network Research Group Department of Computer Science University of Waikato New Zealand - : send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
