On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 5:23 PM Robert Elz <kre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > However, as ksh93 makes "" from this > expansion, and so probably ksh88 might have done as well No, both Sun and SCO variants expand "$@$@" to zero fields when $# is 0.
Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
- From: Oğuz <oguzismailuysal@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:58:15 +0300
- Cc: Marc Chantreux <mc@xxxxxxxxxx>, dash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, busybox@xxxxxxxxxxx, bug-bash@xxxxxxx, Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <17108.1723645239@jacaranda.noi.kre.to>
- References: <20240814004525.A7mNIdWf@steffen%sdaoden.eu> <ZrwTnBvk8_2mdQUS@wooledge.org> <ZrxzCOnZv-HffFuB@prometheus> <17108.1723645239@jacaranda.noi.kre.to>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
- From: Greg Wooledge
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
- References:
- Question on $@ vs $@$@
- From: Steffen Nurpmeso
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
- From: Greg Wooledge
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
- From: Marc Chantreux
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
- From: Robert Elz
- Question on $@ vs $@$@
- Prev by Date: Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
- Next by Date: Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
- Previous by thread: Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
- Next by thread: Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
- Index(es):
 |