Re: [PATCH] Allow enabling job control without a tty in non-interactive mode..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:07:04AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Herbert Xu wrote in
>  <ZhD4JcqNct+rmxca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>  |On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:15:40PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>  |> This is a take-over of the FreeBSD bin/sh
>  |> 
>  |>   commit cd60e2c67d52e1f957841af19128c7227880743a
>  |>   Author:     Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>  |>   AuthorDate: 2014-09-04 21:48:33 +0000
>  |>   Commit:     Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>  |>   CommitDate: 2014-09-04 21:48:33 +0000
>  |> 
>  |>       sh: Allow enabling job control without a tty in non-interactive \
>  |>       mode.
>  |> 
>  |>       If no tty is available, 'set -m' is still useful to put jobs \
>  |>       in their own
>  |>       process groups.
>  |
>  |I don't see why dash needs this.  Please keep in mind that one
>  |of the primary goals of dash it to be minimal.
> 
> Isn't that standardized answer a bit misplaced for that patch?
> It was about Ganael Laplanche having problems with creating
> process groups in backgrounded jobs (2023-01-12):

Sorry, I'd lost the context to the original discussion.  I'll
look into your patch again.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux