Hi! On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:39:17AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 01:46:28PM +0100, наб wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 05:19:17PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > наб <nabijaczleweli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Issue 7, XCU, type, OPTIONS reads "None.", > > > type is marked XSI. dash does claim conformance with respect > > > to XSI. > > Which means it ought to abide by "None." in the OPTIONS sexion, > > as out-lined in the subsequent lines, i.e. discard an initial --, yes. > > Good to see we agree, I guess? > Sorry, I meant that dash does not claim conformance. If I can't convince you to apply this with the consistency argument of "all built-ins that could, would parse their arguments with nextopt()", then do consider the 2/2 that does the same for getopts, which isn't shaded XSI and therefore must support this. Best, наб
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
