On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 12:27 PM Stephen Oberholtzer <stevie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (2) If it absolutely, positively has to be available in POSIX, how can > I submit a proposal for the inclusion of 'pipefail' as an option? It's already been proposed, see discussion at http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=789 - Dan
Re: Proposal: set -o pipefail
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: set -o pipefail
- From: Dan Kegel <dank@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 12:37:42 -0800
- Cc: dash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAD_xR9dZmyJ4+14-0aKB4TxoPzMsWzpbhdsv=R6tw6NT2uHG4Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAD_xR9dZmyJ4+14-0aKB4TxoPzMsWzpbhdsv=R6tw6NT2uHG4Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References:
- Proposal: set -o pipefail
- From: Stephen Oberholtzer
- Proposal: set -o pipefail
- Prev by Date: Proposal: set -o pipefail
- Next by Date: Re: Proposal: set -o pipefail
- Previous by thread: Proposal: set -o pipefail
- Next by thread: Re: Proposal: set -o pipefail
- Index(es):
 |