Thanks for clarifying! The script behaves as expected with the appropriate changes.
Re: POSIX compliance issues with case statements
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: POSIX compliance issues with case statements
- From: Drew DeVault <sir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:36:38 -0400
- Cc: dash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <c7130b4c-45d3-2248-96c5-107424911f48@gigawatt.nl>
- References: <20190417162916.GB1178@homura.localdomain> <c7130b4c-45d3-2248-96c5-107424911f48@gigawatt.nl>
- References:
- POSIX compliance issues with case statements
- From: Drew DeVault
- Re: POSIX compliance issues with case statements
- From: Harald van Dijk
- POSIX compliance issues with case statements
- Prev by Date: Re: POSIX compliance issues with case statements
- Next by Date: POSIX compliance of multi-digit parameter expansion
- Previous by thread: Re: POSIX compliance issues with case statements
- Next by thread: POSIX compliance of multi-digit parameter expansion
- Index(es):
 |