Hello Stephen, Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 02:23:21, Stephen Shirley a écrit : > On 10 November 2014 14:49, Stéphane Aulery <saulery@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le lundi 10 novembre 2014 à 09:24:09, Herbert Xu a écrit : > >> Stéphane Aulery <saulery@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > >> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=501566 > >> > >> I'm sorry but this patch looks wrong and the text looks correct > >> to me as is. > > > > Ok. I passed the information but I'm not really able to judge its > > pertinence. In this case I close this bug. > > So, i finally managed to figure out what the problem is. The wording > is ambiguous (or maybe just insufficiently clear). > > "[n1]>&n2 Duplicate standard output (or n1) to n2." Herbert rejected both corrections. Your new proposal is better but incomplete. Stéphane Chazelas tried to complete it. Moreover you have not made a new proposal for the first correction. As I am not dash user, I do not have a good knowledge of the matter. Can you complete your answer / choice, please? Thank you in advance for your help. Original version: 1) [n1]<&n2 Duplicate standard input (or n1) from file descriptor n2. 2) [n1]>&n2 Duplicate standard output (or n1) to n2. Version on Debian bug tracker and refused by H. Xu: 1) [n1]<&n2 Duplicate standard input (or n1) to file descriptor n2. 2) [n1]>&n2 Duplicate standard output (or n1) from n2. Second version of the patch refused by H. Xu: 2) [n1]>&n2 Redirect standard output (or n1) to n2. Stéphane Chazelas proposals: 1a) [n1]>&n2 Redirect standard output (or fd n1) to the same "open file description" as on fd n2. 1b) [n1]>&n2 Redirect standard output (or fd n1) to the same resource as open on fd n2. 1c) [n1]>&n2 Copy fd n2 as stdout (or fd n1) Regards, -- Stéphane Aulery -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html