> On Oct 1, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I'm not interested in burdening the cygwin build of dash with a one-off >> patch, so I'd like to gauge the upstream thoughts - is it worth >> including platform-specific patches like this (no penalty to build size >> of non-cygwin platforms, and on cygwin, it allows 'cd c:/' to behave as >> shorthand for 'cd /cygdrive/c/')? If the patch lands in dash.git, then >> I'll rebuild the cygwin port of dash to include a backport (rather than >> waiting for 0.5.9 to be released). If there is no interest, I'd rather >> just drop the patch. The cygwin community already states that >> /cygdrive/c notation is the official way to access drive letters, and >> that if 'c:/' works it is nice, but it is not a design goal to always >> have it work. > > It's fine by me. > Is that a yes to allow platform-specific patches into dash? Thanks, -Edward -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html