On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:38:31AM +0930, Malcolm Kay wrote: > I had assumed that 'dash' aimed to be a faster replacement for > the classical Bourne shell 'sh' as implemented in BSD systems, > and this seemed to be confirmed when all the man pages I've been > able to find were more or less direct copies of BSD 'sh' pages. The original ash (at the time of 4.3BSD-Net2) was such a replacement of the SVR4 Bourne shell. But with the next "traditional" BSD release, 4.4BSD alpha, the shell was already aiming at POSIX; and so were the shells on NetBSD (1.0 ff) and FreeBSD, soon. However, there is a relation from 4.3BSD-Net2, 386BSD, earlyNetBSD to a Linux port, and thus a Bourne-like ash interestingly survived with Slackware until 2007 (8.1). dash in contrast was an independent, later port from NetBSD to Linux and was a modern variant from the start. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html