On 08/10/2009 09:03 PM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 12:55:25PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote: >> ccache gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -include ../config.h -DBSD=1 -DSHELL >> -DIFS_BROKEN -Wall -gdwarf-2 -Wall -Werror -MT mystring.o -MD -MP -MF >> .deps/mystring.Tpo -c -o mystring.o mystring.c >> miscbltin.c: In function `umaskcmd': >> miscbltin.c:201: warning: subscript has type `char' >> >> isdigit is only defined over EOF and unsigned char values, so without this >> patch, you can trigger undefined behavior. > > What compiler and what libc was this? isdigit is supposed to > be a function that takes an int argument according to POSIX. > If libc implements it as a macro then it's up to it to cast > the parameter to (int). > > So I think you should fix this in your libc instead. > Herbert... the *type* is int, but the *value* has to be in the range [-1,UCHAR_MAX] or the behavior is undefined in both the C and POSIX standards. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html