In light of my last LKML posts about text processing of (still plain text and open) source http://kernelnewbies.org/olecom i'd like to propose slightly improved maintaining of changes. In this particular case, it is providing `sed` transformation of ' -a ' , ' -o ' to ' ] && [ ' , ' ] || [ ' along with change in built-in `test`. Note again, that -a -o are optional (due to problems) in POSIX. # http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/test.html : test "$1" -a "$2" should be written as: test "$1" && test "$2" to avoid problems if a user supplied values such as $1 set to '!' and $2 set to the null string. That is, in cases where maximal portability is of concern, replace: test expr1 -a expr2 with: test expr1 && test expr2 and replace: test expr1 -o expr2 with: test expr1 || test expr2 ---- As usual, there is an unnoticeable "but": ---- but note that, in test, -a has higher precedence than -o while "&&" and "||" have equal precedence in the shell. #end I wonder if any user of those operands knew this, also i can't understand those "precedence" rules here. It's just even more confusing. == original proposition for -nt -ot (specifying lists of files to check) == Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:51:21PM +0200: > > _Optimization_, i.e. to do not call stat() on the same file on and on. > > This is just silly. > > This is called "userspace sucks" by kernel people, isn't it? Some of those got knocked out (having nothing technical to say) by regexp ninja, i am. http://kerneltrap.org/node/16091 Here's error, however. > Square braces [' && ]' proposed, because they not require escaping > from the shell. Unquoted '[' is the file-name pattern class introduction character. ____ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dash" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html