Re: Automatic encryption of stored messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/04/10 11:06 -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
28.04.2010 04:27, Dan White написав(ла):
On 27/04/10 10:40 -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
Is there a way to encrypt all of the Cyrus' user-specific files on the disk? So that somebody breaking in -- or stealing the server -- has no access to the messages (and other data) unless a user's password is also available?

Interesting question! info-cyrus list is probably more appropriate for
this question.
Having to subscribe to yet-another mailing list, just to be able to send an occasional question or idea, is a turn-off... If this is off-topic on this list, I'll just shut-up...

info-cyrus will have a lot more users of imapd subscribed to it than this
list, and should get you a lot more operational related responses.

The PAM requirement would force the use of saslauthd, and plaintext only
authentication mechanisms, which potentially degrades the over-the-wire
security between the client and server.
Whichever way the user's password (or some function thereof) is communicated to the server -- as long as the communicated string remains constant... Use of PAM is just a possible implementation idea -- a way to off-load some of the changes from the Cyrus' code into a separate little tree (that of the pam-module). The only degradation I can see is that the methods like OTP would no longer work... I don't think, this is a big loss, if the entire traffic is SSL-protected. But that's up to the admin...

PLAIN and LOGIN are the only mechanisms in which a shared secret is passed
to the server (and hence a potential security issue). In some other
mechanisms, the server knows the shared secret (digest-md5, cram-md5 and
srp?). EXTERNAL (x.509 certificate) and kerberos mechanisms don't know the
shared secret, although there potentially be room for encryption
(afs?).

Another opt-in approach would be for users to encrypt all private messages
within the MUA using PGP/GPG.

That approach exists now, but requires each user and /all of their correspondents/ to set PGP for themselves. It also requires cooperation from MUA, of course. My way is purely on the server and transparent to the users.

--
Dan White

[Index of Archives]     [Info Cyrus]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Linux Media]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux