Hi, On Tuesday, 2008 September 30 at 17:55:44 +0100, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Alexey Melnikov wrote: > >> Kurt Zeilenga wrote: >> >>> I think I've changed my mind regarding this patch. >>> >>> At least with first caller wins, the function pointers don't bounce >>> around as they presently do. >> >> I think I can do a better patch. sasl_set_mutex should be allowed to >> be called any number of times, as long as these calls are before the >> first sasl_client_init/sasl_server_init call. > > Eric, > I've just committed my change to CVS. Can you please double check if it > fixes your problem? I've launched NuFW test system with the modified library and everything works fine. PS: your patch is really better than mine ;) BR, -- Eric Leblond INL: http://www.inl.fr/ NuFW: http://www.nufw.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
