Ken Murchison <murch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 09:57:07AM -0400: > The changes to sasl_decode64() were mainly to decode partial blocks of > Base64 data, but as a side-effect, it now ONLY accepts Base64 data and > NOT any protocol bits such as the leading "+ " or the trailing "\r\n". > > So, an application needs to remove these protocol bits before passsing > the data to sasl_decode64(). A quick and dirty fix for Mutt would be > the following: > > if (!mutt_strncmp (inbuf, "+ ", 2) > && sasl_decode64 (inbuf+2, strlen (inbuf)-4, buf, LONG_STRING-1,&len) > != SASL_OK) > > > However, it would be safer to check for the "\r\n" before trimming it. Hi Ken, I'll post your input to the mutt mailing list. Thank you Sebastian
