Thank you! I agree, but automake has its own set of pros... Its format is much simpler and readable and most people can manage in using minimum version of it. So if you don't like to add automake, will you consider accepting another patch that adds install-strip target? Alon. On 11/1/08, Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > This patch contains some fixes to aespipe build: > > 1. Add quotes to AC_DEFUN to configure.ac so autoconf will not complain. > > 2. Add datarootdir to Makefile.in so autoconf will not complain. > > 3. Support DESTDIR make variable to allow standard "make install > > DESTDIR=/tmp/root", so package manages may use make install. > > 4. Allow separate build directory (mkdir xx; cd xx; ../configure), add > > srcdir support. > > 5. Add aespipe as dependency for install. > > > I merged your patch. Thanks. > > > > If you like I will be very happy to convert current Makefile to automake, > > it would be much easier to maintain. > > > automake creates it own set of problems, so I am not a big fan of it. > Problems: unreadable generated Makefile and nasty automake version > dependency for people who need to modify Makefile/Makefile.am > > > -- > Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD > - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
