* Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 07:21:46PM +0300, Jari Ruusu wrote: > > However, you will need a bleeding edge distro to compile that. It won't > > compile on all boxes. util-linux-2.12r and earlier are compatible with many > > distros, including older ones. It's pretty sad to see such excellent > > compatibility ruined by this "new" -ng version. :( > > Do you have any examples? I'm open for patches that improve > compatibility. Well, your question makes me wonder on which platforms you test your -ng code (and why those?). So, I ran simple some "./configure && make" tests on slackware 12, 11, 10.2, and 10.0 (both plain source of -ng and Jari's patch applied). You seem to be "in the clear" of some serious slackware wrath, it seems. ;p Anyhow, why -ng in the first place; what's wrong with mainline util-linux? A link will do, just curious. -- left blank, right bald
Attachment:
pgpqcg809EtAX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
