-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jari Ruusu wrote: > Looks like performance does not differ much for above prealloc values. Only > tiobench sequential reads using many threads showed some improvement with > lo_prealloc=250, but maximum latencies went up too. > > No change for default lo_prealloc=125 based on above data. ok, but since i've made the prealloc parameter a "tuneable" for my script, i'll probably use it for the next benchmarks. thanks, Christian. (PS: my benchmarks really convinced me to use AES, and not other ciphers, at least on x86. it's way faster....) - -- BOFH excuse #115: your keyboard's space bar is generating spurious keycodes. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCgo3k+A7rjkF8z0wRAiTOAKCFjeJ0qLoABAf85NEs2xEjmQWemwCfeuvx EXjDYFq2Q9UNsJIV8C4cW+U= =sfCW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
