On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R wrote: > Well, that is a separate story and completely different from what > you mentioned. You presented a personal issue you needed assistance with and > I tried to help you out. Now you are angry because IO provided a solution, > and it does not meet your broadest imaginable needs. Im not angry at all, im just pointing out that your solution is not a solution at all -- it is a microsoft "solution", or more like a dilbert-style "solution". Current i-patch is not totally broken but it *is* extremely flawed. No amount of billgates-style handwaving and "mkfs workarounds" will make the current bugs simply evaporate. Only a discussion of the current bugs and examination of the code will fix things. Sticking your head in the sand and pretending the bugs (dont exist|will magically disappear) wont help the situation. -Dan Linux-crypto: cryptography in and on the Linux system Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/
