Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Introduce new cpufreq helper macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stratos,

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 07:05:17 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>> On 29/04/2014 07:17 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> > On 26 April 2014 01:45, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
>> >> can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and
>> >> makes the necessary changes to cpufreq core and drivers that
>> >> use such an iteration procedure.
>> >>
>> >> The motivation was a usage of common procedure to iterate over
>> >> cpufreq_frequency_table across all drivers and cpufreq core.
>> >>
>> >> This was tested on a x86_64 platform.
>> >> Most files compiled successfully but unfortunately I was not
>> >> able to compile sh_sir.c pasemi_cpufreq.c and ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
>> >> due to lack of cross compiler.
>> >>
>> >> Changelog
>> >>
>> >> v4 -> v5
>> >>         - Fix warnings in printk format specifier for 32 bit
>> >>           architectures in freq_table.c, longhaul, pasemi, ppc_cbe
>> >
>> > Doesn't look much has changed and so it stays as is:
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>>
>> Thank you very much!
>
> I've applied the series to my bleeding-edge branch, will move it to linux-next
> after build testing later this week.

This breaks if CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n, e.g. ARM/shmobile/koelsch/
non-multiplatform:

drivers/built-in.o: In function `clk_round_parent':
clkdev.c:(.text+0xcf168): undefined reference to `cpufreq_next_valid'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `clk_rate_table_find':
clkdev.c:(.text+0xcf820): undefined reference to `cpufreq_next_valid'
make[3]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1

drivers/sh/clk/core.c (pre-CCF shmobile clock core) calls
cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry():

#define cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table)        \
        for (pos = table; cpufreq_next_valid(&pos); pos++)

but cpufreq_next_valid() in drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c is not
compiled in.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux