On 16 April 2014 03:55, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which > can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and > makes the necessary changes to cpufreq core and drivers that > use such an iteration procedure. > > The motivation was a usage of common procedure to iterate over > cpufreq_frequency_table across all drivers and cpufreq core. > > This was tested on a x86_64 platform. > Most files compiled successfully but unfortunately I was not > able to compile sh_sir.c pasemi_cpufreq.c and ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c > due to lack of cross compiler. > > Changes v1 -> v2 > - Rearrange patches > - Remove redundant braces > - Fix a newly introduced bug in exynos5440 > - Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry instead of > cpufreq_for_each_entry in cpufreq_frequency_table_get_index() > - Drop redundant double ! operator in longhaul and change You dropped this !! in thermal stuff and not longhaul :) > the pos loop cursor variable to freq_pos. > - Declare pos variable on a separate line > > Stratos Karafotis (8): > cpufreq: Introduce macros for cpufreq_frequency_table iteration > cpufreq: Use cpufreq_for_each_* macros for frequency table iteration > davinci: da850: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration > mips: lemote 2f: se cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration > mfd: db8500-prcmu: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration > thermal: cpu_cooling: Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macro for > iteration > irda: sh_sir: Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macro for iteration > sh: clk: Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macro for iteration Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
