On 03/27/2014 03:37 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> CPUFreq core doesn't control value of .driver_data and this field is completely
> driver specific. This can contain any value and not only indexes. For most of
> the drivers, which aren't using this field, its value is zero. So, printing this
> from core doesn't make any sense. Don't print it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> index 8e54f97..f002272 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> && table[i].driver_data == CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ)
> continue;
>
> - pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz, %u driver_data\n",
> - i, freq, table[i].driver_data);
> + pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz\n", i, freq);
> if (freq < min_freq)
> min_freq = freq;
> if (freq > max_freq)
> @@ -175,8 +174,8 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> } else
> *index = optimal.driver_data;
>
> - pr_debug("target is %u (%u kHz, %u)\n", *index, table[*index].frequency,
> - table[*index].driver_data);
> + pr_debug("target index is %u, freq is:%u kHz\n", *index,
> + table[*index].frequency);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
