On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We are about to free the data structure. Make sure no timer callback
> is running. I might be paranoid, but the ->exit callback can be
> invoked from so many places, that it is not entirely clear whether
> del_timer is always called on the cpu on which it is enqueued.
In normal cases it will be called only when CPU goes offline and I
hope that isn't called on the dying CPU.
> While looking through the call sites I noticed, that
> cpufreq_init_policy() can fail and invoke cpufreq_driver->exit() but
> it does not return the failure and the callsite happily proceeds.
Thanks for reporting this, will get it fixed.
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: cpufreq <cpufreq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: pm <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: tip/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ tip/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_cpu_exit(struct
> {
> int cpu = policy->cpu;
>
> - del_timer(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->timer);
> + del_timer_sync(&all_cpu_data[cpu]->timer);
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
