On 03/14/2014 01:13 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Whenever we are changing frequency of a cpu, we are calling PRECHANGE and > POSTCHANGE notifiers. They must be serialized. i.e. PRECHANGE or POSTCHANGE > shouldn't be called twice continuously. Following examples show why this is > important: > [...] > This was discussed earlier here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/25/402 > > Where Rafael asked for better fix, as he called the V1 fixes: "quick and dirty". > This is another approach, much simpler than previous one. Please see if this > looks fine. There is a TODO note in there as I wanted some suggestions on how > exactly should we wait for a transition to get over. > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index 2677ff1..66bdfff 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -324,6 +324,13 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > } > } > > +static void notify_transition_for_each_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > + struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, unsigned int state) > +{ > + for_each_cpu(freqs->cpu, policy->cpus) > + __cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, freqs, state); > +} > + > /** > * cpufreq_notify_transition - call notifier chain and adjust_jiffies > * on frequency transition. > @@ -335,8 +342,35 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > void cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, unsigned int state) > { > - for_each_cpu(freqs->cpu, policy->cpus) > - __cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, freqs, state); > + if ((state != CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE) && (state != CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)) Wait a min, when is this condition ever true? I mean, what else can 'state' ever be, apart from CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE and POSTCHANGE? > + return notify_transition_for_each_cpu(policy, freqs, state); > + > + /* Serialize pre-post notifications */ > + mutex_lock(&policy->transition_lock); Nope, this is definitely not the way to go, IMHO. We should enforce that the *callers* serialize the transitions, something like this: cpufreq_transition_lock(); cpufreq_notify_transition(CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); //Perform the frequency change cpufreq_notify_transition(CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); cpufreq_transition_unlock(); That's it! [ We can either introduce a new "transition" lock or perhaps even reuse the cpufreq_driver_lock if it fits... but the point is, the _caller_ has to perform the locking; trying to be smart inside cpufreq_notify_transition() is a recipe for headache :-( ] Is there any problem with this approach due to which you didn't take this route? > + if (unlikely(WARN_ON(!policy->transition_ongoing && > + (state == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE)))) { > + mutex_unlock(&policy->transition_lock); > + return; > + } > + > + if (state == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE) { > + while (policy->transition_ongoing) { > + mutex_unlock(&policy->transition_lock); > + /* TODO: Can we do something better here? */ > + cpu_relax(); > + mutex_lock(&policy->transition_lock); If the caller takes care of the synchronization, we can avoid these sorts of acrobatics ;-) Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat > + } > + > + policy->transition_ongoing = true; > + mutex_unlock(&policy->transition_lock); > + } > + > + notify_transition_for_each_cpu(policy, freqs, state); > + > + if (state == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE) { > + policy->transition_ongoing = false; > + mutex_unlock(&policy->transition_lock); > + } > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_notify_transition); > > @@ -983,6 +1017,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(void) > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->policy_list); > init_rwsem(&policy->rwsem); > + mutex_init(&policy->transition_lock); > > return policy; > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > index 31c431e..e5cebce 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > @@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ struct cpufreq_policy { > * __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT); > */ > struct rw_semaphore rwsem; > + bool transition_ongoing; /* Tracks transition status */ > + struct mutex transition_lock; > }; > > /* Only for ACPI */ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html