On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:27:01PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Sorry for late response, looks like Rafael has pulled this change, but ... > >+menu "Power management options" > >+ > >+source "kernel/power/Kconfig" > >+ > >+source "drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig" > >+ > >+endmenu > Is this patch based on recent kernels ? If so, either it should have caused > conflicts or silently duplicated the entries. "Power management options" are > already present. Yes, it was against -next. It looks like either the original patch had the duplication or it crept in there during the rather lengthy time between submission and acceptance. > Also to be more consistent it with menu options, I would prefer this to be > placed under "CPU Power Management" like CPUIdle. I'll submit an incremental patch for this; in general the best thing to do once things have been applied is to send a patch.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
