On Friday, February 28, 2014 09:18:02 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 28 February 2014 07:28, Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > __cpufreq_stats_create_table always gets pass the valid and real policy > > struct. So, there's no need to call cpufreq_cpu_get() to get the policy > > again. > > > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 12 +----------- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-) > > All patches look fine now. Rafael you can queue them up as per your > convenience. > > @Saravana: Though I am quite sure you still need my patches to get > your initial issue fixed. So, can you please get them tested as early > as possible, so that we can get them in for 3.14? That's a bit late ... > @Srivatsa: Your reviews will also help :) -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
