Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpu0: make THERMAL_CPU support optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3 February 2014 21:44, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That's certainly fine by me, but I don't know which platforms those are.

Probably OMAP as the author came from TI and has tested it on OMAPs

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/26/787

> BTW, REGULATOR could probably be dropped as well. It certainly works
> w/o a regulator as highbank does not define one.

Sure. Get that out as well in the same patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux